The Role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads

Oct 13, 2025 by vinooalluri.com 94 views

The Role of Pancasila Youth in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads: A Study of Victory of Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte as Regent and Deputy Regent of Labuhan Batu 2015

Introduction

In the world of politics, the role of youth organizations in supporting the nomination of regional heads is a crucial aspect of the election process. One such organization that has made a significant impact in this regard is the Pancasila Youth, specifically the Branch Leadership Council (MPC) of Pancasila Labuhan Batu Youth. In 2015, the regional head election in Labuhan Batu became a public spotlight, especially with the victory of the candidate pair Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte. This study aims to analyze the forms of the role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in supporting the pair's campaign as well as the strategies used in the selection process.

The Role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads

MPC Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu utilizes social networks and organizational strengths to support the nomination of Pangonal and Andi Suhaimi. The strategies implemented include mass mobilization, grand campaigns, visits to regions, and giving food. In addition, they also intervene in other candidates not to commit fraud during the election. This shows that Pancasila youth not only play a role in sound mobilization, but also as a controller in the selection process.

Theoretical Framework

The theory used in this study includes the theory of political elites, power theory, and local BOS theory. These theories become the basis of analysis to understand how MPC Pemuda Pancasila carried out its role in the campaign. In this context, the political elite related to the Pancasila youth functions as a strategic driver who directs campaign policies and decisions to win.

Research Methodology

The research method applied is qualitative research with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature studies. This study provides a deeper understanding of how the Pancasila Youth Organization implements effective campaign strategies. The results showed that the influence of MPC Pemuda Pancasila was very important in shaping local political forces, especially with the direction of the organization's leadership.

The Success of Pancasila Youth in the Campaign

One indicator of the success of the Pancasila youth in this campaign is their ability to move the masses. The grand campaign they held succeeded in attracting the attention of many voters, while visits to regions increase closeness with the community. This all shows the synergy between campaign strategies and organizational support.

The Coercive Power Model

Theoretically, the coercive power model can also be seen in this context. Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte, as a candidate for deputy regent, uses the resources owned to ensure that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions. This creates a climate that encourages individuals to obey and submit to leadership, which is in line with repressive motivational models according to Andrain.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila Labuhan Batu in supporting the nomination of Pangonal Harahap and Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte showed that social networks and organizational strength had a major impact on the regional head election process. Through the mobilization and control strategy, the Pancasila youth managed to become one of the decisive factors in the victory of this couple, as well as reinforce their position in local politics.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

The Pancasila Youth Organization should continue to utilize its social networks and organizational strengths to support the nomination of regional heads.
The organization should also continue to implement effective campaign strategies, such as mass mobilization and grand campaigns.
The organization should also continue to intervene in other candidates not to commit fraud during the election.
The organization should also continue to use the coercive power model to ensure that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study only focused on the role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in supporting the nomination of regional heads in Labuhan Batu.
The study only used qualitative research methods, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of the Pancasila Youth Organization.
The study only analyzed the campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization, and did not analyze the impact of these strategies on the election outcome.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on the following areas:

The role of the Pancasila Youth Organization in supporting the nomination of regional heads in other regions.
The impact of the campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization on the election outcome.
The use of coercive power model by the Pancasila Youth Organization in ensuring that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions.

References

Andrain, C. (2010). Repressive Motivational Models. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 341-354.
Pancasila Youth Organization. (2015). Annual Report 2015. Labuhan Batu: Pancasila Youth Organization.
Suhaimi Dalimunte, A. (2015). Speech at the Grand Campaign. Labuhan Batu: Pancasila Youth Organization.

Appendix

List of interviewees
List of literature studies
List of campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization
Q&A: The Role of Pancasila Youth in Supporting the Nomination of Regional Heads

Q: What is the role of Pancasila Youth in supporting the nomination of regional heads?

A: The Pancasila Youth, specifically the Branch Leadership Council (MPC) of Pancasila Labuhan Batu Youth, plays a crucial role in supporting the nomination of regional heads. They utilize social networks and organizational strengths to support the nomination of candidates, and implement effective campaign strategies to win the election.

Q: What are some of the strategies used by the Pancasila Youth in supporting the nomination of regional heads?

A: The Pancasila Youth uses various strategies to support the nomination of regional heads, including mass mobilization, grand campaigns, visits to regions, and giving food. They also intervene in other candidates not to commit fraud during the election.

Q: What is the theoretical framework used in this study?

A: The theoretical framework used in this study includes the theory of political elites, power theory, and local BOS theory. These theories become the basis of analysis to understand how the Pancasila Youth carried out its role in the campaign.

Q: What is the research methodology used in this study?

A: The research method applied is qualitative research with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature studies. This study provides a deeper understanding of how the Pancasila Youth Organization implements effective campaign strategies.

Q: What is the success of the Pancasila Youth in the campaign?

A: One indicator of the success of the Pancasila Youth in this campaign is their ability to move the masses. The grand campaign they held succeeded in attracting the attention of many voters, while visits to regions increase closeness with the community.

Q: What is the coercive power model?

A: Theoretically, the coercive power model can also be seen in this context. Andi Suhaimi Dalimunte, as a candidate for deputy regent, uses the resources owned to ensure that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions. This creates a climate that encourages individuals to obey and submit to leadership.

Q: What are the recommendations of this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

The Pancasila Youth Organization should continue to utilize its social networks and organizational strengths to support the nomination of regional heads.
The organization should also continue to implement effective campaign strategies, such as mass mobilization and grand campaigns.
The organization should also continue to intervene in other candidates not to commit fraud during the election.
The organization should also continue to use the coercive power model to ensure that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including:

The study only focused on the role of MPC Pemuda Pancasila in supporting the nomination of regional heads in Labuhan Batu.
The study only used qualitative research methods, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of the Pancasila Youth Organization.
The study only analyzed the campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization, and did not analyze the impact of these strategies on the election outcome.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should focus on the following areas:

The role of the Pancasila Youth Organization in supporting the nomination of regional heads in other regions.
The impact of the campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization on the election outcome.
The use of coercive power model by the Pancasila Youth Organization in ensuring that all supporting elements follow the directions and instructions.

Q: What are the references used in this study?

A: The references used in this study include:

Andrain, C. (2010). Repressive Motivational Models. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 341-354.
Pancasila Youth Organization. (2015). Annual Report 2015. Labuhan Batu: Pancasila Youth Organization.
Suhaimi Dalimunte, A. (2015). Speech at the Grand Campaign. Labuhan Batu: Pancasila Youth Organization.

Q: What is the appendix of this study?

A: The appendix of this study includes:

List of interviewees
List of literature studies
List of campaign strategies used by the Pancasila Youth Organization